Analysis of Advanced Criminalistics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Analysis of Advanced Criminalistics - Assignment ExampleThis is however not the eccentric person, the real suspect had left fingerprints on the very saliva that he spoke onto and deoxyribonucleic acid testing would have indicated otherwise. Finally, the clerk was not aware of what was going on at the time of the robbery. The maintain that the only thing he could remember was some(prenominal)one who had clothes that resembled those of the customer and the front end of the gunpoint. In other words, the suspect had planted samples with the customers DNA without the antecedent knowledge of the clerk. People can be implicated in a crime based on their DNA. Claims have shown that DNA composition is unique on every person except in twins. In case a crime has happened and between two twins, one was involved and later fled to a quad place. The other twin will be implicated to have been involved in the crime. Furthermore, DNA is a chemical compound and is bound to mutations and change (P orada & Straus, 2001). both(prenominal) tests done on DNAs of people have errors and when used as evidence, may lead to arresting of a person who was not inescapably a perpetrator of the crime. Finally, scientists can fabricate DNA of one person resembles the DNA of another person. In such instances, when scientist fabricates DNA obtained from saliva or line of business samples of a particular crime scene, they put people whose DNA matches the fabricated DNA, at risk of implication. Identification of the source of the DNA should always be made. This is because some of these detectable levels have errors and some of them are based on truth. Also, most of the detectable levels rely on probability and as a result, they do not give concrete evidence that someone was involved in a crime and that is why identification of the DNA source should be made. In the case of Samantha death and identification of Alejandro Avila, DNA identification played a major role (Raymond, 2002). DNA found o n Samanthas dead body was compared to DNA found on the car of Avila and they were found to be identical.